Connect with us

New Movie News

The most anticipated movies of 2017

Published

on

Image: ladd company

Blade Runner 2049 is almost upon us — and the early reviews suggest that director Denis Villeneuve has done an excellent job adding to the world of Ridley Scott’s 1982 cult favorite, Blade Runner

Naturally, as a geek who wants to be prepared and fully hyped for such cultural events, you are considering watching (or rewatching) Scott’s original Blade Runner before 2049 is released next week. And then you run straight into the brick wall of a question that has smacked many a sci-fi nerd over the years: Which original Blade Runner?

As detailed in the comprehensive and recently updated book Future Noir: The Making of Blade Runner, a total of seven versions of this seminal movie were made. Two drastically different cuts were screened for test audiences pre-release; then the release version was altered for international audiences in 1982 and for TV in 1986.  

After that we got the misnamed Blade Runner Director’s Cut in 1992 and the Final Cut in 2007 — which is so optimistically titled, one suspects that somewhere on Ridley Scott’s hard drive there exists  BLADE_RUNNER_FINAL_FINAL_FINAL_CUT.MOV. 

In terms of what you can easily watch, you basically have three options. You can’t get any of them on Netflix, Hulu or Amazon Prime. You can buy or rent the 1982 release, which is available on Amazon Video (the one simply titled Blade Runner) and the download service Vudu. 

Then the Director’s Cut is on Amazon for $6 more than the Final Cut, also on Amazon and Vudu and YouTube Movies, and as a $27 Blu-Ray. The Final Cut is also on FandangoNOW for a special rental price of $1.99, and $5.99 to buy.

Confused yet? No wonder the co-writer of Blade Runner 2049, Michael Green, threw up his hands at the question and told io9 the best version is “whichever you can watch tonight.” 

But in the age of digital delivery, when you can watch three versions tonight, this is a glib, unsatisfying answer. You’re going to drop two hours of your precious time on this film; why not take a few minutes to figure out which one is best for you?

The internet isn’t much help. Amazon’s reviews  lump all three versions together. Same with Rotten Tomatoes, which unhelpfully gives the movie just one score — 91% — and in turn powers Apple’s reviews. So if you’ve hit the Blade Runner wall, here’s what you need to know.

1. Original flavor Blade Runner 

What’s different: Narration and a happy ending. 

When it comes to Star Wars, our culture’s consensus says the 1977 version was better than the 1997 Special Edition which added too much George Lucas tinkering. With Blade Runner, the reverse is true: according to an informal poll in Future Noir, some 70% of viewers prefer the later versions. 

The main reason? The studio insisted on two additions to the 1982 release: Harrison Ford narrating some lines of Rick Deckard’s thoughts in classic film noir style; the first is “they don’t advertise for killers in the newspapers.” Ford had to be dragged kicking and screaming to the voiceover studio, and some of us can really hear his reluctance. Secondly, a happy ending to the story that seemed tacked on — it’s not much of a spoiler alert that Scott intended the famously dark movie to have a dark, ambiguous ending. 

However, as Future Noir author Paul Sammon points out, Scott was actually in favor of the voiceover back in 1982; it gave the movie the old-time feel he was looking for. Some Deckard narration had shown up in early scripts by revered screenwriter Hampton Fancher, who fell out with Scott. And some audiences actually liked the happy ending after two hours of unrelenting grimness. 

If you’re among the 30% who prefers Ford’s narration and a lovely green final scene to contrast all that rain, there’s no shame in that. 

2. The Director’s Cut

What’s different: The unicorn with wobbling horn.

The 1992 Director’s Cut is literally and figuratively the middle child of the various Blade Runners. Despite its title, Scott did not supervise the cut, which was one of two (!) put together by editors for local art-house screenings, mostly without Scott’s knowledge while he directed the movie 1492: Conquest of Paradise.  

The fact that Scott signed off on calling it a “director’s” cut is down to two things: firstly, it removed the “happy ending” scene. The movie now ended with the discovery of an origami unicorn. 

Secondly, it inserted a scene that was supposed to come earlier in the movie, where Deckard falls asleep at his piano dreaming of an actual unicorn. Naturally, these two things become significant when you piece them together, and they change everything you know about Deckard. (Again, I’m trying not to spoil things for the newbies.) 

For the Director’s Cut, however, the unicorn scene from 1982 could not be found; just trimmed bits from the cutting room floor. These show the white stallion’s polystyrene horn wobbling. Other amateur filmmaking moments also went unfixed, like a scene with out-of-sync dialogue and the wires on the police “spinner” or flying car. 

In short, you should avoid the Director’s Cut — unless you really don’t like the changes in the Final Cut. 

3. The Final Cut 

What’s different:The resolution, the lighting, the lip sync and one less swear.

The 25th anniversary version from 2007 is, according to Ridley Scott, the definitive Blade Runner. We tend to agree, but not without some concerns. 

Scott, you see, is of the George Lucas school. He believes directors should be allowed to return to their movies and retrofit them the way a painter might touch up a painting. He’s never done anything as outrageous as when Lucas made Greedo shoot before Han, but The Final Cut walks that line.  

The Final Cut is certainly the highest resolution version; you can now get it in all the glory of 4K. But seeing it in HD made Ridley Scott decide to bring up the lighting in more than a few scenes to bring out details previous audiences had missed. In doing so, he made this version literally less “noir” than its predecessors. 

The dialogue sync problem in one scene was solved by the most elaborate means you can imagine — Harrison Ford’s son Ben was brought in to literally lip sync his dad’s lines. His mouth was digitally stitched onto Ford senior’s. For purists, this is a fix too far. 

But to many minds, the most egregious tweak is in the movie’s dialogue itself. In most previous versions, replicant Roy Batty (Rutger Hauer) screams at his creator “I want more life, fucker.” The Final Cut changed this to “I want more life, father” — just as it was changed for the TV version in 1986. 

Scott tried to laugh off the swear removal: “Must mean I’m getting older,” he said at a press roundtable quoted in Future Noir. Some fans liked it — it is metaphorically apt for the scene — while some fans saw it as as the equivalent of Greedo shooting first. 

So now you have all the spoiler-free information you need to chose between the three versions. We recommend The Final Cut, which is certainly the best bargain on Amazon. But no Blade Runner is entirely free of its problems. 

In any case, we’re sorry if a simple decision about which version to watch has turned into a total father. 

Read more: http://mashable.com/2017/09/29/blade-runner-which-version-watch/

New Movie News

James Gandolfini’s son has been cast as a young Tony Soprano in prequel movie

Published

on

Michael Gandolfini at HBO’s Official Golden Globe Awards After Party in LA, January 2019

Image: Getty Images / Frederick M. Brown

The upcoming Sopranos prequel movie just found its young Tony Soprano, and the casting couldn’t be more perfect.

19-year old actor Michael Gandolfini, son of James Gandolfini (and the original Tony Soprano), will revive his father’s most famous role in the prequel movie called The Many Saints of Newark.

While the shoes of Tony Soprano are some mighty big ones to fill (James Gandolfini won two SAG awards, one Emmy, and one Golden Globe for the role)Michael Gandolfini, who previously starred in The Deuce, said he’s thrilled to take on the role made so famous by his late father.

“It’s a profound honour to continue my dad’s legacy while stepping into the shoes of a young Tony Soprano,” he said in a statement to Deadline, in which he also expressed his excitement to work with Sopranos creatorDavid Chase.

“I’m thrilled that I’m going to have the opportunity to work with David Chase and the incredible company of talent he has assembled for The Many Saints of Newark.”

Chase is writing and producing The Many Saints of Newark, which is to be directed by Alan Taylor.

Per Deadline, the movie will be set in Newark in the 1960s. The story will not specifically centre around young Tony Soprano, but around Richard “Dickie” Moltisanti, whose son, Christopher, is a recurring character on The Sopranos. 

Since Moltisanti is Italian for “many saints,” it’s really right there in the title.

Read more: https://mashable.com/article/michael-gandolfini-tony-soprano-prequel-movie/

Continue Reading

New Movie News

Spielberg Casts 17 Year Old Youtuber as Maria in West Side Story

Published

on

 

Director Lord Steven Spielberg has plucked a relatively unknown 17-year-old schoolgirl from the depths of the internet and dropped her right in the middle of his upcoming most-likely box office gold hit movie West Side Story. The 72-year-old ET director is helming the modern adaption of the classic musical, and felt New Jersey student Rachel Zegler would make a perfect Maria, once made famous by late screen siren Natalie Wood in the 1961 original. The student will star alongside Ansel Elgort, who is in the role of Tony in the movie that is bound to be take all our money in tickets.

Read more:  https://metro.co.uk/2019/01/15/steven-spielberg-casts-17-year-old-youtuber-latest-probable-blockbuster-west-side-story-8346545/?ito=cbshare

Continue Reading

New Movie News

Netflix is begging people to stop doing the ‘Bird Box’ challenge

Published

on

Always look where you’re driving, no matter what they do in ‘Bird Box.’

Image:  Netflix

“Despite warnings from Netflix and just general common sense, it looks like people are still participating in that stupid Bird Box Challenge. Now, it has reportedly caused a car crash.

On Friday morning, the Layton Police Department of Layton, Utah shared the images showing the aftermath of a car crash in which one of the drivers was allegedly trying to drive with their eyes covered. They reportedly called out the Bird Box Challenge specifically.

Police told KSL that the driver, a 17-year-old girl, was driving the pickup truck seen in the photos above on Monday when the incident occurred. Additionally, Layton Police Lt. Travis Lyman said of the 17-year-old driver:

“Apparently, as a part of this ‘Bird Box Challenge,’ (the driver) used her beanie to pull over her eyes as she was driving on Layton Parkway, and she ended up losing control of her car and skidded into the westbound lanes of Layton Parkway and hit another car and ended up hitting a light pole as well.”

Of course, if you’ve seen Bird Box, you know there’s a scene in which several characters make a white-knuckle drive in a car with the windows covered, and it’s hardly a smooth ride.

It’s also — and I can’t believe we’re at the point where this actually has to be said — an incredibly dangerous stunt to pull off the in real world.

Luckily, no one was hurt as a result of the crash. But whatever punishment the driver faces, authorities should also consider revoking their Netflix account if this is how they’re gonna behave.”

Read more: https://mashable.com/article/bird-box-challenge-car-accident/

Continue Reading

Trending