Fifty-three people are roasting on the open fire this holiday season, the scorched subjects of a tweet from Netflix that went viral last week reading, To the 53 people whove watched A Christmas Prince every day for the past 18 days: Who hurt you?
We groan-laughed at the tweet when it was sent. Now were annoyed, because it caused the streaming services atrocious holiday film to escalate in popularity to the point where we had to watch it to see what all the fuss is about. Its terrible. Its not even fun-terrible, in the way that all those Candace Cameron Bure movies that Hallmark created its own cottage industry out of.
Its 90 minutes of Prince Harry holiday fan fiction that feels 75 minutes too long.
Even the Christmas decorations are ugly.
Why is everyone watching this movie? Stop watching this movie!
Bad Christmas movies have become part of the litany of holiday season traditions that we convince ourselves we want and performatively enjoy for attention and Instagrams, like Christmas cookie-swaps and braving the crowd at the Rockefeller tree, but are actually torture. The only reward is a headache and latent nausea. By that measure, the saccharine, illogical romance of A Christmas Prince should be served with a chaser of Pepto-Bismol.
Why do we convince ourselves that this schmaltz is worth watching, even ironically? There are so many legitimately good Christmas movies for people to watch. Good movies that are actually on Netflix include: White Christmas, The Santa Clause, The Nightmare Before Christmas, and even Bad Santa. What are we doing watching this shady journalist pratfall into a snow-kissed romance with a smarmy prince?
A Christmas Prince is proof of the #PeakTV theory that people will watch anything, as long as its on Netflix. See also: the fact that Fuller House is one of the most-watched TV series right now, and the people still trying to convince themselves that Stranger Things 2 was good.
The film basically lifts the plot from How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days and accepts the dare from the Princess Diaries producers to come up with a fake country name more ridiculous than Genovia. And thus aspiring journalist Amber is sent to Aldoviaughto get the scoop on the playboy prince who is waffling about taking over the throne. Would you believe they fall in love?
Its not even aspirationally cute, in the they were perfect for each other all along kind of way. When he finally proposes to her in the endis it technically a spoiler when its this obvious?she doesnt respond by swooning into an ecstatic yes; she immediately starts listing all the reasons why an engagement would make no sense and literally ruin her life.
The film opens with a jaunty Christmas song that sounds like Jingle Bell Rock but isnt, and a montage of B-roll from holiday moments in New York City. We meet Amber, a copy editor at a trashy magazine who is fed up with salvaging star writers copy instead of reporting out her own stories. But when no one else is available to travel to Aldovia to cover the drama surrounding the future kings coronation cold feet, she gets her big break.
When the prince doesnt show up for the press conference and all the other journalists go homeyes, apparently a New York-based magazine flew a junior reporter to a foreign country to cover a press conferenceshe sneaks into the palace, lies and says shes the young princesss tutor, and starts reporting from the inside.
Of all the offensive things in this movie, and this is a movie that uses a characters disability as a manipulative plot device, its portrayal of journalism is the most egregious. Yes, it truly is the season of the journalism movie, with The Post and now A Christmas Prince. One is about the necessity of the First Amendment to protect citizens from the tyranny of government. The other is about how its OK for a reporter to lie about her identity, so long as a salacious story is produced from it.
Her big scoop once shes on the inside is that the press has it all wrong about this royal family. Princess Emily, who is in a wheelchair because she has spina bifida, may act like a terror, but Amber sees her for who she really is: a self-conscious little girl who just wants to be normal. And the prince isnt a cad. Hes a good person. He plays with orphans! He doesnt like that being king would steal his attention away from his goodness and orphan-playing.
While pretend-tutoring Princess Emily, Amber falls in love with the prince, whose name I forgot but hes so bland its probably something like John or Mike. (Ah, its Richard.) He falls in love right back. He likes that shes a real girl. She wears Converse sneakers.
We learn along the way that Richard has been in love once before, to a snooty bitch named Lady Sophia who was only with him for attention and sold a story about him to the papers. She does not approve of Richards infatuation with Amber. Lady Sophia is the character with which I most identify.
But Amber and Richards love is impenetrable. They have snowball fights. They ride horses. They bond over dead parents. Things get complicated when Amber accidentally discovers that Richard was adopted, and thus cant be king. She doesnt know what to do. Should she break the story? The next 30 minutes are a tense battle between journalism and love.
There is an onslaught of annoying things that happen next, mostly revolving a handmade acorn Christmas ornament. The films only gay character and only black person are given some lines of dialogue. Everyone lives happily ever after.
All of this should be inoffensive. No scene lasts longer than 22 seconds. There is more jingle music than there is dialogue. None of the acting is discernibly bad. Yet there is something irritatingly shallow about the movie, even when considered as part of the shallow Christmas movie canon.
Theres no grand moral or life lesson either character has to learn. Theres not a lick of warmth or, really, romance. We said it before, but it bears repeating: even the Christmas decorations in the palace are ugly. If youre going to make a Netflix holiday movie, at least give us some decoration porn.
‘Avengers: Infinity War’ hits Netflix next month
All ur friends r ded!
“Avengers: Infinity War will start streaming on Netflix Dec. 25, so you can spend the last week of 2018 just reliving all the joy and pain. This is as much a gift as a curse, depending on how you see it (and on whether or not you’re Thanos).
First of all, how dare you with that “Oh snap,” Netflix, and second of all, heck yeah! Infinity War joins MCU brethren Black Panther, Thor: Ragnarok, and Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 on the streaming platform – that’s pretty good company. It’s likely temporary, as with many Netflix acquisitions, particularly with the looming advent of Disney’s own streaming service.
Since its April release and record-breaking box office run, Avengers: Infinity War has been available for digital rental and download, as well as for viewing on airplanes (a great choice, can confirm!). This will be its debut to a major streaming subscription platform.”
Not a single dog dies in any episode of ‘Dogs’ and Netflix confirmed it
“Dogs is the smartest six-hour Netflix binge anyone can commit to. It’s also, notably, a safe watch for all dog-lovers.
If you, like anyone who has ever owned and/or loved a dog, saw the Dogs announcement and immediately wondered if any of the documentary’s sweet good boys and girls die, Netflix has an answer for you. No. No one dies.
Netflix confirmed the happy detail on Twitter.
“NO DOGS DIE IN ANY EPISODE OF DOGS,” the tweet reads, in all-caps.
The six episodes focus on individual stories that explore the impacts that canines can have on human lives. It’s an exploration of the bonds between the two species, and the tremendous impact that such bonds can have.
As Mashable’s Ali Foreman wrote in our review: “Dogs consistently details how we can help man’s best friend, but it shines when displaying how man’s best friend can help us. As scene-after-scene leaves you beaming with joy, you’ll almost definitely start itching to [adopt a pup of your own].”
All six episodes of Dogs came to Netflix on Nov. 16. You can watch them now right here.”
‘A Christmas Prince: The Royal Wedding’ trailer is here for all your goofy princess fantasies
“Getting married is hard. Getting married to a prince? Even harder (I assume!).
Last year’s silly breakout Netflix holiday movie is getting a sequel: A Christmas Prince: The Royal Wedding.
The trailer shows Amber (Rose McIver) having to adjust to all the problems of marrying into a royal family — paparazzi, plenty of opinions, and even having to give up her beloved blog. That’s where she does her journalism.
Honestly, the whole thing looks pretty low-rent, but also a perfectly fun to way to kill two hours this holiday season.
You already know if this movie is for you or not. If it is, it hits Netflix Nov. 30.”
Netflix Stuff1 day ago
‘Avengers: Infinity War’ hits Netflix next month
New Movie Reviews1 day ago
Creed II review – Rocky saga continues with knockout sequel
New Movie Tech1 day ago
YouTube quietly added free, ad-supported movies to its site
Super Heroes3 hours ago
Epic new ‘Aquaman’ trailer is a story of kings and heroes
Good TV4 hours ago
Bill Gates has a few things to say about HBO’s ‘Silicon Valley’
New Movie Trailers1 hour ago
Serenity – 2019 Trailer #2